Abstract:
Over the past decades, lawmakers have been overhauling the welfare programme of
employment security that has become a central node of attention within labour law
discourse in Zimbabwe. Against this background, the purpose of this article is to
bring to the fore the understanding that the respect to the rights of the workers is an
integral justificatory ideal for labour law that can only become possible through
tripartism. The only existing tripartite United Nations agency, the International
Labour Organisation has helped to bring together governments, employers, and
workers of all 187-member states to set down international accepted labour
standards. Since its formation, the organisation has done a lot in achieving the goal
of a decent working environment in a globalised world economy. The article
demonstrates that, tripartism is not about one group or body overriding the other, it
is not about superiority or who demonstrates more power than the other through the
social dialogue process. It is all about open negotiations that help to advance the
creation of a decent working environment that provide people a stake in lasting
peace, prosperity and progress. The article highlights the importance of the interplay between the role of government and the workers and the rate to which the
parties have successfully addressed the problems and solutions necessary to curb a
common gap in labour law. The primary issue addressed throughout the article
points to a comparative analysis on whether tripartite negotiations have yielded
positive results in labour law. The article then argues that social dialogue is an
instrument in promoting democracy and good governance. Therefore, tripartism
becomes the most powerful tool of dealing with common labour security issues that
other bodies and partners might have failed to resolve.
Description:
The journal is a forum for the discussion of ideas, scholarly opinions and case studies
on law and policy, statutes, constitutions, general rules of the game (institutional
mechanisms) and policy pronouncements or declared positions that are put to
scrutiny, weighed, interpreted and evaluated. In all these matters, the intention and
context usually define the outcomes and impact. The journal is produced bi
annually.