Abstract:
Like many jurisdictions, Zimbabwe has adopted digitisation of legal processes.
While the concept is progressive and modern, it limits the right of access to justice
that is protected by Section 69 of the Zimbabwean Constitution. This article
explains the concept of access to justice and its origins. It then brings to light
various aspects of digitisation that limit the right of access to justice in Zimbabwe.
The article also examines different international instruments ratified by Zimbabwe
that promote the right of access to justice. Furthermore, it shows the developments
that have been made by jurisdictions such as South Africa, Kenya, Russia, and
China pertaining to digitisation of their legal processes. The main aim of showing
the developments that have been made by the aforementioned jurisdictions is to
look at opportunities that Zimbabwe has by drawing lessons from their different
electronic case management systems. Also, regardless of the strides that the
selected jurisdictions have made in accessing justice through digitisation of legal
processes, they still face challenges that Zimbabwe is facing or might potentially
face. Therefore, in the final part, recommendations are made on how the right of
access to justice may be realised in Zimbabwe considering digitisation of legal
processes.
Description:
The journal is a forum for the discussion of ideas, scholarly opinions and case studies
on law and policy, statutes, constitutions, general rules of the game (institutional
mechanisms) and policy pronouncements or declared positions that are put to
scrutiny, weighed, interpreted and evaluated. In all these matters, the intention and
context usually define the outcomes and impact. The journal is produced bi
annually.